India’s telecom production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme, launched in April 2021 to boost domestic manufacturing, has disbursed Rs. 1,162 crore in incentives to 21 of 42 eligible manufacturers by March 31, 2025. Despite ambitious targets — including Rs. 4,115 crore in allocated incentives, Rs. 2.45 lakh crore in sales generation, and over 44,000 jobs — the scheme has faced hurdles such as non-achievement of production thresholds and concerns over white-labeling of imported products. Beneficiaries have reported Rs. 78,672 crore in sales and employment for 26,351 individuals, signaling progress but also highlighting areas needing stricter oversight and enhanced alignment with India’s self-reliance goals.
Overview of the Telecom PLI Scheme
The Department of Telecom (DoT) introduced the production-linked incentive scheme on April 1, 2021, aiming to bolster domestic manufacturing capacity within the telecom equipment sector. Envisioned to run through this fiscal year, the scheme promised a robust framework to incentivize manufacturers for scaling production, enhancing exports, and generating employment.
According to data shared by the DoT under the Right to Information Act, as of March 31, 2025, Rs. 1,162.03 crore has been disbursed to manufacturers. However, only half of the 42 shortlisted companies—21 manufacturers—have received these incentives, reflecting a selective disbursement aligned with performance metrics. The remaining firms either did not meet eligibility criteria or had claims rejected; notably, Coral Telecom Ltd and Alphion India Pvt Ltd faced rejection due to underperformance against scheme thresholds.
Performance Metrics and Economic Impact
While the incentive disbursement marks a significant milestone, the broader economic impact paints a more nuanced picture. Beneficiaries collectively invested Rs. 4,081 crore, translating into Rs. 78,672 crore in total sales by January 2025. This includes Rs. 14,963 crore in export revenue, highlighting the scheme’s contribution to enhancing India’s telecom exports. Employment generated by eligible players stands at 26,351 jobs, a substantial but modest figure relative to the scheme’s original projection of creating over 44,000 new positions.
The government had earmarked Rs. 4,115 crore in incentives, anticipating a multiplier effect that would spur additional sales worth Rs. 2.45 lakh crore. Current figures indicate that while the groundwork is laid, substantial upside potential remains if the scheme’s implementation can be optimized.
Challenges and Industry Concerns
Insiders reveal challenges undermining the scheme’s full potential. A notable concern is the practice of white-labeling, where some manufacturers rebrand imported telecom equipment as domestic products to qualify for incentives. This practice not only diminishes the scheme’s intent to promote indigenous manufacturing but also compresses profit margins and undermines local value addition.
A senior executive from a broadband equipment manufacturer highlighted the need for stringent monitoring mechanisms to curb unethical practices. They emphasized that telecom operators must align their procurement strategies with the government’s self-reliance agenda by favoring products that exhibit substantial local content and contribute to employment.
Leading Beneficiaries and Incentive Distribution
Among the recipients, Jabil Circuit emerged as the largest beneficiary, receiving Rs. 235.87 crore over two fiscal years (2022-23 and 2023-24). Other prominent beneficiaries include Flextronics with Rs. 165.12 crore, Nokia Rs. 157.32 crore, NeoLync Tele Communications (backed by Reliance Industries) Rs. 142.06 crore, Foxconn’s Rising Stars Rs. 80.33 crore, and Syrma SGS Rs. 53.23 crore.
Several manufacturers secured incentives under Rs. 50 crore, including VVDN Technologies (Rs. 48.37 crore), Sanmina-SCI (Rs. 44.35 crore), Dixon India (Rs. 34.78 crore), and GX India (Rs. 20.91 crore), underscoring the diversity of participation within the sector.
Conclusion and Forward Outlook
The telecom PLI scheme represents a critical strategic intervention to strengthen India’s domestic manufacturing ecosystem and reduce dependence on imports. While the initiative has generated meaningful investments, sales, and employment, its partial uptake and implementation gaps signal the need for tighter governance and enhanced industry collaboration.
Addressing the white-labeling issue and incentivizing genuine local value addition will be essential to unlocking the scheme’s full potential. Furthermore, telecom operators’ active participation in procuring domestically manufactured equipment can accelerate job creation and innovation. With the scheme set to conclude this fiscal year, a comprehensive review could help refine future incentives, ensuring India’s telecom manufacturing sector emerges globally competitive and aligned with the government’s vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat.
Comments